Professsor: Ar. Riza Rizalina A. Quincina
Adviser: Ar. Maria Villa A. Sarmiento
Polytechnic University of the Philippines - Lopez, Quezon
This architectural thesis explores the potential of experiential architecture in promoting
agritourism in Guinayangan, Quezon through the proposed GAYANG Agritourism Center. The project integrates local agricultural traditions, sustainable rural development, and
community empowerment by designing immersive and culturally relevant architectural
spaces.
INTRODUCTION
Agritourism merges agriculture and tourism, providing farmers with supplemental
income, enhancing local economies, and educating the public. With the Philippines’ large agricultural land and government support, regions like Quezon—dubbed the
“CALABARZON food basket”—present great potential for farm tourism. Guinayangan, a
municipality known for seafood and agricultural resources, is a strategic site for this
development.
METHODOLOGY
The research used a descriptive method and experiential approach, collecting data
through surveys, interviews, site observations, and consultations with stakeholders
such as government agencies, farmers, and tourists. Case studies, photographic
inventory, and Philippine laws (e.g., PD 1096, BP 344) guided the architectural
programming. Key aspects focused on user-centered design, space circulation, and
community participation.
DATA ANALYSIS
Demographic surveys showed respondents were mostly aged 18–25, male, and
residents. Assessments revealed strong agreement on agritourism’s potential to
supplement farmer income, educate visitors, boost the local economy, and preserve
rural beauty. Respondents also acknowledged possible environmental impacts (e.g., land degradation, water use), but believed in addressing them through sustainable
practices.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Survey results revealed high agreement that a well-designed agritourism center could
serve as a multifunctional space—for community events, education, and local product
marketing. Respondents emphasized incorporating natural lighting, sustainable
materials, flexible spaces, and amenities for visitor comfort. Designs must consider:
Educational elements (signages, displays, workshops)
Operational efficiency for farmers (processing, storage)
Visitor comfort (restrooms, picnic areas)
Sustainable practices (ventilation, orientation, energy use)
CONCLUSIONS
The study confirms that Guinayangan holds strong potential for agritourism
development. The public perceives agritourism as beneficial for the local economy, youth education, and cultural appreciation. However, concerns about environmental
impact must be addressed through responsible design and operations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Market towards young and male demographics
2. Apply sustainable and organic farming methods
3. Develop environmental education programs
4. Use energy-efficient and locally appropriate building systems
5. Engage the local community throughout planning and implementation
6. Monitor environmental and social impact continuously
FINAL THOUGHT
The GAYANG Agritourism Center embodies an innovative solution for rural development. By combining immersive design, community involvement, and sustainability, it can
transform Guinayangan into a thriving hub for cultural tourism, ecological preservation, and local economic growth.
0 comments:
Post a Comment